![ithenticate self plagiarism ithenticate self plagiarism](https://cit.nus.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/plagarism-iThenticate.png)
Zimmer, C.: A sharp rise in retractions prompts calls for reform. Giles, J.: Special report: taking on the cheats. Roberts, J.: An author’s guide to publication ethics: a review of emerging standards in biomedical journals. Schein, M., Paladugu, R.: Redundant surgical publications: tip of the iceberg? Surgery 129, 655–661 (2001) We can use our new section of “News and Views” (Gavin Reid, editor) as a venue for discussion.įinally, we thank Michael Weston for advice on the use of iThenticate and the Editor-in-Chief and the Associate Editors of JASMS as well as the ASMS Board (particularly Evan Williams) for their interest in, and support of this project. Clearly, these are major ongoing concerns for the scientific community, and we would welcome any comments from our JASMS readers. It is interesting to note that since we began this project, there have been several editorials on issues such as plagiarism and retractions. Thus, JASMS is planning the use of iThenticate on all new submissions, and we will continue to rely on our expert reviewers to alert us of potential problems. While it was reassuring that there appears to have been no example of “redundant” and “salami” publishing in the 2009 JASMS papers, when I reported the result at the recent 2012 JASMS editor’s meeting, it was agreed that our community needs to be vigilant.
![ithenticate self plagiarism ithenticate self plagiarism](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/colq4plagiarism-160522122848/95/plagiarism-24-638.jpg)
Faculty and senior authors should discuss these matters with junior authors and urge them to avoid copying and remind them of the evolving tools that are becoming available for checking for overlap. Instead of copying the well-phrased materials, authors should simply use a direct quote (use quotation marks), and give proper attribution.Ĭopying and republishing material may be particularly an issue with graduate and post-doctoral students, who are not aware of the problem or who have trouble writing with ease and speed and feel that taking some material from here and there is something that won’t be noticed. The same is true for material in introductory sections. If certain descriptions are clear, concise, highly valued, and evolved from considerable efforts, authors can always quote this material and give an attribution.
![ithenticate self plagiarism ithenticate self plagiarism](https://0.academia-photos.com/attachment_thumbnails/56602778/mini_magick20190111-21309-1rbw3z4.png)
They ask “how many ways can we describe an experimental protocol that we use over and over for different chemical systems?” We suggest that authors attempt to recast these sections, even in minor ways, to avoid accusations of self-plagiarism. Many of our colleagues do not regard self-plagiarism as a serious matter, especially in experimental sections. To help editors resolve these cases, some journals set an upper limit for the amount of text that can be reused, usually about 30 %.” While JASMS has not defined such a limit, we highly recommend that authors do not cut corners by replicating parts from previous papers. As noted by Giles, “researchers routinely commit minor plagiarism without dishonest intent, such as reusing parts of an introduction from an earlier paper. This raises the interesting question of how much overlap is acceptable. Some overlap was found, typically in the experimental section. Five papers were closely examined and compared with papers published by the same research groups in other journals. When the JASMS article under study was removed, the Similarity Index was significantly lower in most cases, suggesting there was little overlap between the published JASMS article and papers published in other journals. All of the JASMS articles gave a high Similarity Index (ranging from 52 % to 90 %) because the reports included the actual JASMS article that was checked since it was published.